Boutiques and the AI edge

Scale is often touted as an asset manager’s most significant moat. However, as Tom Caddick argues, artificial intelligence challenges this notion, and arguably hands the advantage to smaller, nimbler firms.

Spend five minutes on your social media platform of choice and you will inevitably be served a post by an author claiming to have built a hedge fund in half a day with full back-tested results and little more than an LLM subscription and a newly minted mini-PC to handle the excessive compute demands.

It’s an alluring tale. The other day I started to wonder what this extreme (not to mention unregulated) form of investment boutique might teach us about how and why smaller managers might have an edge in adopting AI.

Levelling the playing field

A decade ago, keeping pace with the research output of a global asset manager meant having an army of employees.

Artificial intelligence turns this on its head. Much of what scale used to buy is now available to anyone with a subscription and the judgment to use it well. Breadth of coverage, speed of synthesis and the capacity to read everything and miss nothing, the marginal cost is collapsing to zero.

For large asset managers, adopting a new tool is a huge project in its own right. Pilot committees spring up, as do technology councils and change-management consultants.

In well-run boutiques, however, the distance between “we should try this” and “it's live” can be measured by the distance between desks. We speak to each other. And when the person deciding is also the person accountable for performance and the person who owns the outcome, decision trees collapse from quarters into days.

Buy, not build

The costliest way to adopt AI is to build it yourself – bespoke models, engineering teams and infrastructure that runs into the millions before it returns a penny.

Boutiques don’t have to do this. We can rent the frontier – through the same world-class research, data and large language-model tools our largest competitors are spending fortunes to reconstruct in-house – and we point it at the problems that matter most to us.

The result is that a firm managing a fraction of the assets can wield a comparable analytical capability, minus the overhead, the committees and the sunk cost.

Ask any large manager where its data lives and you will hear a list of about fifteen systems, four acquisitions and a multi-year programme to unify them. In contrast, successful AI adoption requires lean, connected information and a culture capable of adopting a new workflow because everyone can see why it’s better, not simply because a memo arrived from head office.

Art and science

Nowhere does all this matter more than in the investment process.

AI lets a relatively lean team scan thousands of filings, transcripts and news sources every week and surface the handful of signals worthy of a human’s attention. It can draft the first pass so our analysts spend their hours deploying their expert judgment. It can stress-test a thesis, play devil’s advocate against our own conviction and flag the anomaly a tired eye would typically miss.

However, and this is routinely lost amid the hype, it should not make the decision. The active investment edge has always been about judgment – i.e., knowing what matters, having the conviction to act and taking accountability for the result. In this sense, AI should be thought of as a multiplier, not a threat.

Let me give you a small example of why. Recently, when gilts sold off, a colleague put a simple question to two of the best-known AI systems: after gilt prices fall one per cent in a day, what usually happens next?

The answers came back immaculately reasoned but completely and utterly useless. Prices, the first explained, may rise, fall, or – wait for it – stay much the same, depending on circumstance.

Asked instead for the probability of a rebound, the second declined, on the grounds that no precise figure was available. Except that it is. Two minutes on a Bloomberg terminal reveals the day after such a fall is close to a coin toss, something any experienced investment team already knows.

Active investing has always been both art and science. The science is the part AI now does brilliantly and for almost nothing.

Yet it doesn’t have the taste to know which question is worth asking, or the judgment to weigh a plausible answer against what will actually happen, let alone the feel for context that turns information into conviction. Such qualities do not scale well with headcount and cannot be bought by the terabyte. This is why AI, far from commoditising what we do, throws the value of our taste into sharper relief.

Agility vs bureaucratic drag

There are, of course, limits. AI cannot erase every advantage of scale. Distribution still typically rewards larger players; a brilliant, AI-augmented process means nothing if no one can find you. And the technology rewards firms whose data is in order and whose people are willing to change – neither of which is guaranteed by being small.

But these are hurdles we can clear, and quickly. As I see it, the incumbent’s problem is harder. Agility cannot simply be bolted onto an organisation built for a world where size alone was the firm-wide objective. Which brings me back to the character I opened with – the AI-influencer who built a hedge fund before lunch with an LLM subscription and a mini-PC. It is easy to scroll past, and mostly you should.

A boutique, at its best, is the rare place that holds both the solo builder’s speed and the seasoned desk’s judgment, under one roof and answerable to the client. That is the real edge, and it is not something that can be bolted on. Offered the choice between defending it and trying to acquire it, I know which side I would rather be on.

NB. A version of this article originally appeared in Investment Week.

Dislaimer

This is a marketing communication. Please refer to the prospectus, the key investor information documents (the KIIDs/PRIIPS KIDs) and the financial statements of Nedgroup Investments Funds plc (the Fund) before making any final investment decisions.

These documents are available from Nedgroup Investments (IOM) Ltd (the Investment Manager) or via the website: www.nedgroupinvestments.com, where the prospectus is available in English and the KIIDs/KIDs in English and the official languages of each country of registration.

This document is of a general nature and for information purposes only, it is not intended for distribution to any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of any country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Whilst the Investment Manager has taken all reasonable steps to ensure that this document is accurate and current at the time of publication, we shall accept no responsibility or liability for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions relating to the information and topics covered in this document.

The Fund is authorised and regulated in Ireland by the Central Bank of Ireland. The Fund is authorised as a UCITS pursuant to the European Communities (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities) Regulations 2011 as amended and as may be amended, supplemented, or consolidated from time -to-time and any rules, guidance or notices made by the Central Bank which are applicable to the Fund.  The Fund is domiciled in Ireland. Nedgroup Investment (IOM) Limited (reg no 57917C), the Investment Manager and Distributor of the Fund, is licensed by the Isle of Man Financial Services Authority. The Depositary of the Fund is Citi Depositary Services Ireland DAC, 1 North Wall Quay, Dublin 1, Ireland. The Administrator of the Fund is Citibank Europe plc, 1 North Wall Quay, Dublin 1, Ireland.

The sub-funds of the Fund (the Sub-Funds) are generally medium to long-term investments and the Investment Manager does not guarantee the performance of an investor's investment and even if forecasts about the expected future performance are included the investor will carry the investment and market risk, which includes the possibility of losing capital.

The price of shares may go down or up depending on fluctuations in financial markets outside of the control of the Investment Manager meaning an investor may not get back the amount invested.

Past performance is not indicative of future performance and does not predict future returns.

Risks and fees are outlined in the relevant Sub-Fund supplement.

Prices are published on the Investment Manager’s website.

Distribution: The prospectus, the supplements, the KIIDS/PRIIPS KIDS, constitution, country specific appendix as well as the annual and semi-annual reports may be obtained free of charge in English for the prospectus and in English together with the relevant local languages for the KIIDs/KIDs  from the country representative, the Investment Manager, or at www.nedgroupinvestments.com. The Investment Manager may decide to terminate the arrangements made for the marketing of its collective investment undertakings in accordance with Art 93a of Directive 2009/65/EC and Art 32a of Directive 2011/61/EU.

Switzerland: The Representative is Acolin Fund Services AG, Maintower, Thurgauerstrasse 36/38, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland, whilst the Paying agent is Banque Heritage SA, Route de Chêne 61, CH-1211 Geneva 6. Nedgroup Investments (IOM) Limited is affiliated to the Swiss ombudsman: Verein Ombudsstelle Finanzdienstleister (OFD), Bleicherweg 10, CH-8002 Zurich.

Germany: The Fund’s Facilities agent in Germany is Acolin Europe AG, with the registered office at Line-Eid-Strasse 6, 78467 Konstanz. The Prospectus (in English) and the PRIIPS KID (in German), may be obtained free of charge at the registered office of the Facilities agent, or electronically by Email via facilityagent@acolin.com, or by using the contact form at https://acolin.com/services/facilities-agency-services.

U.K: Nedgroup Investments (UK) Limited (reg no 2627187), authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, is the facilities agent. The Fund and certain of its sub-funds are recognised in accordance with Section 264 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

Isle of Man: The Fund has been recognised under para 1 sch 4 of the Collective Investments Schemes Act 2008 of the Isle of Man. Isle of Man investors are not protected by statutory compensation arrangements in respect of the Fund.